- Winxspro A Channel Cross Section Analyzer User's Manual Download
- Winxspro A Channel Cross Section Analyzer User's Manual Online
Abstract
Jul 04, 2015 WINXSPRO is a software design to analyze stream channel cross section, generate geometric and hydraulic date for single channel flow and perform sediment transport analysis.
WinXSPRO is an interactive Windows ™ software package designed to analyze stream channel cross section data for geometric, hydraulic, and sediment transport parameters. WinXSPRO was specifically developed for use in high-gradient streams (gradient> 0.01) and supports four alternative resistance equations for computing boundary roughness and resistance to flow. Cross section input data may be from standard cross section surveys using a rod and level or sag-tape procedures. WinXSPRO allows the user to subdivide the channel cross section into multiple sub-sections and has the ability to vary water-surface slopes with discharge to reflect natural conditions. Analysis options include developing stage-discharge relationships, evaluating changes in channel cross-sectional area, and computing sediment transport rates. Resource specialists can use the estimated stream-channel geometry cross section hydraulic characteristics and sediment transport output to assist with channel design and monitoring, instream flow analysis, the restoration of riparian areas, and the placement of instream structures.
![Winxspro A Channel Cross Section Analyzer User Winxspro A Channel Cross Section Analyzer User](https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/nfrsblog/resource/BLOGS_UPLOADED_IMAGES/CMD.jpg)
Winxspro A Channel Cross Section Analyzer User's Manual Download
- Annual resurveys of 48 cross sections & 90 bank erosion pins over 5 years streambed particle size distributions. WinXSPro used to assess volume of channel‐boundary erosion between. WinXSPRO, A channel cross section analyzer, user’s manual, version 3.0.
- Ponds 1 and 2. Reaches 3, 4 and 5 F-TABLES were developed using WINXSPRO, a channel cross-section analyzer software package (U.S. Forest Service, 1977). WINXSPRO develops a stage-discharge relationship by synthesizing stream cross-section information, reach slope, and roughness data. F-TABLES for each reach are summarized in Appendix 1.
Winxspro A Channel Cross Section Analyzer User's Manual Online
- Abbott MB (1979) Computational hydraulics. Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Abbott MB, Ionescu F (1967) On the numerical computation of nearly horizontal flows. J Hydraul Res 5:97–117Google Scholar
- Abbott MB, Petersen HM, Skovgaard O et al (1978) On the numerical modelling of short waves in shallow water. J Hydraul Res 16:173–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bates PD, De Roo APJ (2000) A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. J Hydrol (Amst) 236:54–77. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00278-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bates PD, Horrit MS, Smith CN, Dason D et al (1997) Integrating remote sensing observations of flood hydrology and hydraulic modeling. Hydrol Process 11:1777–11795. doi:3.0.CO%3B2-E'>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199711)11:14<1777::AID-HYP543>3.0.CO;2-E3.0.CO%3B2-E'>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blake SH (2001) An unsteady hydraulic surface water model of the lower cosumnes river, California, for the investigation of floodplain dynamics. University of California Davis, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Chowdhury S, Kjeld J (2002) Simulation of coastal flooding with MIKE 11 and HEC-UNET. Solutions to coastal disasters, pp 205–214Google Scholar
- Cunge JA, Holly FM, Verwey A et al (1980) Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K et al (2000) Flood inundation simulation in a river basin using a physically distributed hydrological model. Hydrol Process 14:497–519. doi:3.0.CO%3B2-U'>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000228)14:3<497::AID-HYP951>3.0.CO;2-U3.0.CO%3B2-U'>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gottardi G, Venutelli M (2004) Central scheme for two-dimensional dam-break flow simulation. Adv Water Resour 27:259–268. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hammersmark CT, Fleenor WE, Schladow SG et al (2005) Simulation of flood impact and habitat extent for a tidal freshwater marsh restoration. Ecol Eng 25:137–152. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.02.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hardy T, Panja P, Mathias D et al (2005) WinXSPRO, a channel cross section analyzer, user’s manual, version 3.0. USDA. Mountain Research StationGoogle Scholar
- Hunter NM, Bates PD, Matthew S, Horritt MS, Wilson MD et al (2007) Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorphology 90:208–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jain SK, Agarwal PK, Singh VP et al (2007) Hydrology and water resources of India. Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- Kale VS (1997) Flood studies in India: a brief review. J Geol Soc India 49:359–370Google Scholar
- Meng J, Cao Z, Carling PA et al (2006) pointwise and upwind discretizations of source terms in open-channel flood routing. J Hydrodynam 18(4):397–386. doi:10.1016/S1001-6058(06)60111-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merwade V, Cook A, Coonrod J et al (2008) GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environ Model Softw 23:1300–1311. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mishra A, Anand A, Singh R, Raghuwanshi NS et al (2001) Hydraulic modeling of Kangsbati main canal for performance assessment. J Irrig Drain Eng 127:27–34. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:1(27)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nunes CF, Rego FC, Saraiva MDG et al (1998) Coupling GIS with hydrologic and hydraulic flood modelling. Water Resour Manag 12:229–249. doi:10.1023/A:1008068426567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramesh R, Datta B, Bhallamudi SN, Narayana A et al (2000) Optimal estimation of roughness in open channel flows. J Hydraul Eng 126:299–303. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2000)126:4(299)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renyi L, Nan L (2002) Flood area and damage estimation in Zhejiang, China. J Environ Manag 66:1–8. doi:10.1006/jema.2002.0544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shumuk Y, Zabil D, Ward P, Millar R, Kjelds JT, Henry R et al (2000) Updating the design flood profile for the Fraser River gravel reach with the Mike 11 hydrodynamic model. Presentation to the CWRA 53rd annual conference, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Singh SK (2004) Analysis of uncertainties in digital elevation models in flood (hydraulic) modeling. Masters thesis, International Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun, India. http://www.itc.nl/library/papers_2005/msc/ereg/kumar.pdf
- Strelkoff T (1970) Numerical solution of Saint-Venant equations. J Hydraul Div 96:223–252Google Scholar
- Tayfur G, Kavvas ML, Govindaraju RS, Storm DE et al (1993) Applicability of St. Venant equations for two dimensional overland flows over infiltrating rough surfaces. J Hydraul 119:51–63. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:1(51)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vijay R, Aabha S, Apurba G et al (2007) Hydrodynamic simulation of river Yamuna for riverbed assessment: a case study of Delhi region. Environ Monit Assess 130:381–387. doi:10.1007/s10661-006-9405-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang JS, Ni HG, He YS et al (2000) Finite-difference TVD scheme for computation of dam-break problems. J Hydraul Eng 126:252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang GT, Yao C, Okoren C, Chen S et al (2006) 4-Point FDF of Muskingum method based on the complete St Venant equations. J Hydrol (Amst) 324(1–4):339–349. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar